The dynamic you describe reads less like someone deciding about a relationship and more like someone protecting their comfort. When someone shifts between closeness and distance over this long a span, the pattern itself becomes the answer: he’s maintaining access to you without committing to the responsibility that comes with clarity. When I look at this intuitively, his actions show hesitation, nostalgia, and self‑interest woven together. None of that supports a stable partnership. His claim of faithfulness feels selective — truthful only within the limits he personally recognizes, not within the limits you would expect. This isn’t a “lost cause” because of you. It’s a loop he has no incentive to break. The only real movement will come from your boundaries, not his promises.
The dynamic you describe reads less like someone deciding about a relationship and more like someone protecting their comfort. When someone shifts between closeness and distance over this long a span, the pattern itself becomes the answer: he’s maintaining access to you without committing to the responsibility that comes with clarity. When I look at this intuitively, his actions show hesitation, nostalgia, and self‑interest woven together. None of that supports a stable partnership. His claim of faithfulness feels selective — truthful only within the limits he personally recognizes, not within the limits you would expect. This isn’t a “lost cause” because of you. It’s a loop he has no incentive to break. The only real movement will come from your boundaries, not his promises.
...Read more