Can you do a very detailed deep extensive intuitive tarot reading for me and Nader with 3 cards for every aspect, 33 cards total?

I would not promise that Louis will contact you again on his own. After a couple of weeks, the meaningful fact is not what he may be feeling but what he is choosing to do: he has not maintained the connection. If you want clarity, send one simple, direct message—something that invites an actual conversation rather than hints at one. Give him room to respond, and judge the situation by his consistency, not by the warmth of a possible reply. Numerology can describe patterns, but it cannot turn reluctance into readiness; your part is to stop carrying the entire connection.

I would not promise that Louis will contact you again on his own. After a couple of weeks, the meaningful fact is not what he may be feeling but what he is choosing to do: he has not maintained the connection. If you want clarity, send one simple, direct message—something that invites an actual conversation rather than hints at one. Give him room to respond, and judge the situation by his consistency, not by the warmth of a possible reply. Numerology can describe patterns, but it cannot turn reluctance into readiness; your part is to stop carrying the entire connection.

What came through first, as I sat with your question, was that Alfred's leaving wasn't about you. There's a part of him that carried a quiet fear: "one day she'll see I'm not enough, and she'll leave first." So he left before that could happen. It was self-protection, not rejection. But his feelings for you didn't go anywhere. I sense him still holding you in a private corner of his heart, almost as if distance made it safer to love you unseen. Here's the thing: a true return won't come while he's still running from himself. When it does come, it will be after an inner reckoning, a moment when he finally names the fear. As for timing, I don't see it as soon. There's a season of quiet processing ahead of him first. And marriage, I think, only becomes possible if he returns whole, able to stay, not just missing you. Watch for that.

What came through first, as I sat with your question, was that Alfred's leaving wasn't about you. There's a part of him that carried a quiet fear: "one day she'll see I'm not enough, and she'll leave first." So he left before that could happen. It was self-protection, not rejection. But his feelings for you didn't go anywhere. I sense him still holding you in a private corner of his heart, almost as if distance made it safer to love you unseen. Here's the thing: a true return won't come while he's still running from himself. When it does come, it will be after an inner reckoning, a moment when he finally names the fear. As for timing, I don't see it as soon. There's a season of quiet processing ahead of him first. And marriage, I think, only becomes possible if he returns whole, able to stay, not just missing you. Watch for that.

In the Vedic tradition the voice you describe is the Antaryamin, the inner witness, who speaks to every conscience quiet enough to listen. That it spoke to you is not a sign of special election; it is a sign that the teaching is true for all. Tat tvam asi — thou art that. Yet here is the subtlest danger on this path: ahamkara, the I-maker, which thrives even in holy garments. A story may be coherent and repeated and still be woven by the mind. Your skepticism is not an obstacle; it is your protection. Keep it. Judge the experience by its fruits. Does it deepen patience, humility, kindness, the willingness to serve unnoticed? Then it serves dharma. If it requires that others recognize your role, the old ego has merely changed clothes. And remember the name you carry, Shaul: the calling came suddenly, but what made him worthy was the long labor that followed.

In the Vedic tradition the voice you describe is the Antaryamin, the inner witness, who speaks to every conscience quiet enough to listen. That it spoke to you is not a sign of special election; it is a sign that the teaching is true for all. Tat tvam asi — thou art that. Yet here is the subtlest danger on this path: ahamkara, the I-maker, which thrives even in holy garments. A story may be coherent and repeated and still be woven by the mind. Your skepticism is not an obstacle; it is your protection. Keep it. Judge the experience by its fruits. Does it deepen patience, humility, kindness, the willingness to serve unnoticed? Then it serves dharma. If it requires that others recognize your role, the old ego has merely changed clothes. And remember the name you carry, Shaul: the calling came suddenly, but what made him worthy was the long labor that followed.